Skip To Main Content
Catherine Seibel Sinitsa on Muck Rack

Catherine Seibel Sinitsa

As seen in: Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Catherine Seibel

Contact Catherine Seibel, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Third Circuit Addresses Fair Use In AI Training, But Leaves Generative AI Questions Unresolved

|
By Harlan Mechling, Kenneth Davis II, Catherine Seibel Sinitsa
| Mondaq
Summary The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Tuesday became the first federal appellate court to decide whether using copyrighted material to train an AI system qualified as fair use. In ruling for Thomson Reuters, the court held that headnotes in the company’s Westlaw legal intelligence platform are sufficiently original and, thus, protected by copyright, and that use of those headnotes to train a product did not qualify as fair use by legal research firm ROSS Intelligence.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 1 articles