Skip To Main Content
Ching Yin on Muck Rack

Ching Yin

As seen in: Biomed Central (BMC), BMC Psychology
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Ching

Contact Ching, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

A qualitative exploration of active ingredients and mechanisms of action of an online singing programme with mothers experiencing postnatal depression during the COVID-19 pandemic: SHAPER-PNDO study | BMC Psychology | Full Text

|
By Ching Yin
| BMC Psychology Verified
Figure 1 shows the full list of M4M programme ingredients identified by the research team (AB, DF and LG) presented in the INNATE framework and colour-coded according to the similarities between M4M-online and M4M-in-person. The full checklist of ingredients using the comprehensive INNATE worksheet is provided in the Supplementary Material. In all, there were several key similarities in the project (green), showing shared ingredients.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Acceptability of self-collected vaginal samples for human papillomavirus testing for primary cervical cancer screening: comparison of face-to-face and online recruitment modes | BMC Public Health | Full Text

|
By Lesley SK, Ching Yin, Hextan YS, Annie NY
| Biomed Central (BMC)
This acceptability study was approved by the local institution’s ethics review board (The University of Hong Kong and Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster Institutional Review Board) and conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The primary outcome was the uptake rate of HPV self-sampling, calculated by the number of samples returned/the number of self-samples kits distributed.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 2 articles