Chris H. Park on Muck Rack

Chris H. Park

Washington, D.C.
As seen in: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), The Diplomat Magazine, The Spectator, U.S. NAVAL INSTITUTE, RealClear Defense, The Spectator (World), The Spectator Australia, Threat Beat
@CSIS Research Associate & @SAISStrat Alum

Get in touch with Chris H.

Contact Chris H., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Chris H. Park’s Biography

Read Full Bio →

Chris H. Park is a research associate for the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He researches northeast Asian security and defense planning.

Articles

Rebuilding U.S. Missile Inventory: A Multiyear Project

|
By Mark Cancian, Chris H. Park
| Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
Campaigns against Iran and its proxies—and, for Patriot interceptors, aid to Ukraine—have made the problem more acute. Alongside replenishing its own stocks, the United States also has to fulfill orders from allies and partners. Decisions on how to allocate new production have already created bilateral friction, and this friction will continue for the next few years as demand outpaces supply. The Trump administration understands the urgency.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Chris H. Park

|
By Chris H. Park
| Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
Chris H. Park is a research associate for the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He researches Northeast Asian security and defense planning. Prior to CSIS, he was a graduate research assistant for former Deputy Director of Central Intelligence John E. McLaughlin and an undergraduate research assistant for Dr. Steven R. David.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Assessing the Air Campaign After Three Weeks: Iran War By the Numbers

|
By Mark Cancian, Chris H. Park
| Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
After Day 10, the pace settled down to 300–500 targets per day as the campaign needed to maintain a sustainable tempo. Aircraft required maintenance, and crews needed rest. Further, the rate of adding targets likely declined as the original list was exhausted. Developing new targets takes time as they need to be identified, validated to ensure the identification was correct, and developed into an attack package.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 31 licensed articles (32 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Chris H.

Contact Chris H., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified