Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Get in touch with Christophe
Contact Christophe, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck RackActions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Articles
Cumulative risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in registries internationally: systematic review and meta-analysis of selected hip stems and cups
Record: found Abstract: found Article: found Is Open Access Author(s): , , , , , , , , , , , the Arthroplasty registry group Publication date (Electronic): Keywords: , , , , , There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Cumulative risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty in registries: Systematic review and meta-analysis of selected hip stems and cups
Abstract Purpose The objective was to investigate the consistency in cumulative revision rates for a selection of total hip arthroplasty cups and stems across national/regional hip arthroplasty registries worldwide. Methods Ten cups and 10 stems from total hip systems were randomly selected. Two frequently used implants across registries were added, totalling 11 cups and 11 stems. Cumulative revision rates (CRR) and 95%CIs were extracted from the latest annual registry reports using these implants.
Clinical investigations to evaluate high-risk orthopaedic devices: a systematic review of the peer-reviewed medical literature
Keywords: systematic review; hip arthroplasty; knee arthroplasty; clinical evidence; registries; medical device regulation Introduction Little is known about the clinical evidence used to establish the safety and performance of medical devices before and after market access in Europe. Unlike medicines in Europe and in the USA, and medical devices that are subject to pre-market authorization in the USA, there has been no requirement for summaries of clinical evidence to be made publicly available.
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Christophe
Contact Christophe, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack