Skip To Main Content
Dang Anh Ngoc on Muck Rack

Dang Anh Ngoc

As seen in: Lexology, uminho.pt
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Dang Anh

Contact Dang Anh, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Development of a BIM-based Master Digital Model using data-driven design for the suspension bridge

|
By Dang Anh Ngoc, Chang Su
| uminho.pt
Skip navigation tequery Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/96815 Título: Development of a BIM-based Master Digital Model using data-driven design for the suspension bridge Palavras-chave: BIM Data-driven design Master digital model Suspension bridge Editora: Tipo: Atas de conferência URI: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/96815 ISBN: 978-981-16-7159-3 e-ISBN: 978-981-16-7160-9 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-7160-9_182 Versão da editora:...
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

In brief: arbitration agreements in Vietnam

|
By Dang Anh Ngoc, Ngoc Minh, Le Dzung, Nguyen Minh
| Lexology Verified
Arbitration agreement Arbitrability Are there any types of disputes that are not arbitrable? The LCA extends the authority of arbitrators to various types of disputes that (1) arise from commercial activities, (2) involve parties where at least one is engaged in commercial activities and (3) are required to be resolved or capable of being settled by arbitration pursuant to the laws.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

In brief: enforcing and challenging arbitral awards in Vietnam

|
By Ngoc Minh, Le Dzung, Nguyen Minh, Dang Anh Ngoc
| Lexology Verified
Proceedings subsequent to issuance of award Interpretation and correction of awards Does the arbitral tribunal have the power to correct or interpret an award on its own or at the parties’ initiative? What time limits apply? The tribunal may on its own initiative or at the request of a party, within 30 days of the date of issuance of the award, rectify obvious errors in spelling or figures caused by a mistake or incorrect computation in the award and shall immediately notify the parties.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 5 articles