Daniel Burns on Muck Rack

Daniel Burns

Southampton
As seen in: The New York Times, Business Insider, Reuters, The Washington Post, BMJ Open, Chicago Tribune, Taylor & Francis Online, The Royal Army Medical Corps Journal, The Dallas Morning News, National Review and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Daniel

Contact Daniel, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Evidence for proactive interference effects in repetitive checking tasks

|
By Daniel Burns, Nuo Chen, Kailin Zhu, Rebecca Tegiacchi
| Taylor & Francis Online
ABSTRACT Why does repeatedly checking one’s actions, a common behaviour of those with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), undermine memory confidence? The most accepted explanation is that repetitive checking decreases confidence by increasing familiarity with the task, leading to the encoding of fewer perceptual details. We argue that checking, per se, does not decrease memory confidence.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Hobbes and God in Locke’s law of nature

|
By Daniel Burns
| Taylor & Francis Online
I am grateful to Kimberley Burns, Devin Stauffer, Micah Watson, and above all the two anonymous BJHP reviewers, for their valuable feedback and criticisms. I would also like to thank the Catholic University of America's Institute for Human Ecology for a generous fellowship that allowed me to complete this paper. No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). Notes 1 The regulation of politics means primarily the regulation of laws: 2 T, 3.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Hobbes and God in Locke’s law of nature

|
By Daniel Burns
| Taylor & Francis Online
ABSTRACT Locke bases his moral and political philosophy on his doctrine of the ‘law of nature’. Scholars have debated the content and grounding of this law and its relationship to Christian theology. The ambiguities of the Lockean natural law’s content are traceable to an unclear grammatical construction in a crucial passage of the Treatises of Government, which can be resolved by following out a related set of arguments in that work.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 40 licensed articles (42 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Daniel

Contact Daniel, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified