David Colquhoun on Muck Rack

David Colquhoun

London
As seen in: Nature, The Guardian, The Independent (UK), Wiley Online Library, heart, Aeon, The Spectator, International Journal of Cardiology
Biophysicist, statistician. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Colquhoun @davidcolquhoun.bsky.social @david_colquhoun@mstdn.socialnet
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with David

Contact David, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

|
By David Colquhoun
| hrcrecruitment.co.uk
What made you want to join HRC Recruitment? Joining HRC Recruitment felt like a natural choice for me. The values here align with mine, and there’s a genuine drive to make a difference that resonates with me. HRC has a stellar reputation not just for achieving exceptional results, but also for prioritising the well-being of both clients and employees. I was drawn to the opportunities for personal development and an encouraging environment that promotes growth and innovation.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Resonators and kindred frauds

|
By David Colquhoun
| dcscience.net
Googling ‘bioresonance therapy’ produces a large number of hits. One of the first comes from the Oxford Chiropractic Clinic, which says “Bioresonance is one of the most exciting innovative complementary health therapies of our time.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Using artificial intelligence (AI) to assess the prevalence of false or misleading health-related claims

|
By Les Rose, Susan Bewley, Mandy Payne, David Colquhoun
| royalsocietypublishing.org
While considerable progress has been made in recent years to establish evidence as the basis for healthcare decisions, many practices are still based on poor science. A distinction can be made between practices which are based on plausible science but have weak clinical evidence, and those that are based on a system of theories, assumptions and methods erroneously regarded as scientific. The latter are termed pseudoscience [1].
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 36 licensed articles (39 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified