Dixie Morrison
As seen in:
Reuters,
New York Law Journal,
Law360,
JD Supra,
The National Law Review,
Lexology,
Mondaq,
Proskauer,
LexBlog,
Law360 UK
and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Dixie Morrison
End of the Line: Supreme Court Declines to Hear Former NLRB Member Wilcox’s Dismissal Challenge
[co-author: Claire Caroli] On October 19, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the D.C. Circuit’s decision upholding President Trump’s removal of former National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) Member Gwynne A. Wilcox. Although a denial of certiorari is not a ruling on the merits, it leaves in place the D.C. Circuit’s holding that the National Labor Relations Act’s (“NLRA” or “Act”) removal protections for Board Members unconstitutionally restrict the President’s authority.
California’s 2027 Employment Laws: More Rules, Higher Stakes
Fall has arrived, and Sacramento once again has supplied California employers with something scarier than Halloween ghouls: another round of workplace legislation. This year’s harvest includes restrictions on artificial intelligence, expanded leave rights, and steeper penalties. There is even a temporary reprieve from last year’s “stay-or-pay” restrictions. (Apparently, some regulations need a little regulating themselves.) Here is what employers should know.
California’s 2027 Employment Laws: More Rules, Higher Stakes
Anthony J. Oncidi is the Co-Chair Emeritus of the Labor & Employment Law Department and heads the West Coast Labor & Employment group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.
Here We Go Again: California’s Minimum Wage Is Headed Up To $17.40
Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Insurance topic(s) It’s that time of year again—the temperatures are high, summer vacations are winding down, and Sacramento has taken the minimum wage up another notch. Beginning January 1, 2027, California’s statewide minimum wage will increase from $16.90 to $17.40 per hour. Importantly, the 50-cent bump has implications even for employers with no minimum wage workers because it also raises the salary threshold required for exempt employees.
Here We Go Again: California’s Minimum Wage Is Headed Up to $17.40
It’s that time of year again—the temperatures are high, summer vacations are winding down, and Sacramento has taken the minimum wage up another notch. Beginning January 1, 2027, California’s statewide minimum wage will increase from $16.90 to $17.40 per hour. Importantly, the 50-cent bump has implications even for employers with no minimum wage workers because it also raises the salary threshold required for exempt employees. Starting January 1, 2027, that threshold will rise to $72,384.
Here We Go Again: California’s Minimum Wage Is Headed Up to $17.40
Anthony J. Oncidi is the Co-Chair Emeritus of the Labor & Employment Law Department and heads the West Coast Labor & Employment group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.
A Court Website for Everyone: Inside the New NYCourts.gov
Photo: New York Unified Court System via AP For New York lawyers accustomed to navigating the state court system’s once sprawling online presence, the recent launch of the redesigned New York State Unified Court System website represents a welcome modernization—one whose importance extends well beyond aesthetics.
There They Go Again! California Launches Another Attack On Arbitration
Anthony J. Oncidi’s articles from Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel with readers working within the Consumer Industries industries You might think that California employers who seek nothing more than enforcement of a perfectly reasonable arbitration agreement might finally be able to stop looking over their shoulders, but that is simply not going to happen anytime soon.
There They Go Again! California Launches Another Attack on Arbitration
You might think that California employers who seek nothing more than enforcement of a perfectly reasonable arbitration agreement might finally be able to stop looking over their shoulders, but that is simply not going to happen anytime soon. It seems that with each new legislative session, Sacramento comes up with yet another scheme to limit employers’ right to arbitrate employee disputes.
California Federal Court Grants Employer Summary Judgment Despite Protected Whistleblowing
A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment in favor of an employer despite evidence of protected whistleblowing is instructive. Han v. Pfizer (No. 23-cv-039080-AMO).
California Federal Court Grants Employer Summary Judgment Despite Protected Whistleblowing
Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Insurance and Technology topic(s) A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment in favor of an employer despite evidence of protected whistleblowing is instructive. Han v. Pfizer (No. 23-cv-039080-AMO).
Cal. Federal Court Grants Employer Summary Judgment Despite Protected Whistleblowing
A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment in favor of an employer despite evidence of protected whistleblowing is instructive. Han v. Pfizer (No. 23-cv-039080-AMO).
Cal. Federal Court Grants Employer Summary Judgment Despite Protected Whistleblowing
A recent decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granting summary judgment in favor of an employer despite evidence of protected whistleblowing is instructive. Han v. Pfizer (No. 23-cv-039080-AMO).
Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up , EXPERT INSIGHTS—$103 million ‘thermonuclear‘ age discrimination verdict overturned in Los Angeles , (Jun 3, 2026)
Articles Law Firms Organizations Law Firms Mentioned:Proskauer Rose By Anthony J. Oncidi and Dixie Morrison of Proskauer Rose LLP In a welcome reminder that eye-popping punitive damage awards still face meaningful judicial scrutiny, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has struck down an $83 million punitive damages award that was entered against Liberty Mutual in Slagel v. Liber ... You have no more complimentary views available this month.
From Best Practice To Exhibit A: The Hidden Risk Of Workplace Investigations
Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Insurance topic(s) Employers love a good investigation story—prompt response, outside counsel, thorough interviews, the whole compliance greatest-hits album. But the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Paknad v. Superior Court is a sharp reminder that if you plan to rely on your investigation in litigation, you may end up handing over the director’s cut.
$103 Million “Thermonuclear” Age Discrimination Verdict Overturned In Los Angeles
Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Insurance topic(s) In a welcome reminder that eye-popping punitive damage awards still face meaningful judicial scrutiny, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has struck down an $83 million punitive damages award that was entered against Liberty Mutual in Slagel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. However, the court left intact a $20 million award for emotional distress damages associated with alleged age discrimination and harassment.
$103 Million “Thermonuclear” Age Discrimination Verdict Overturned In Los Angeles
In a welcome reminder that eye-popping punitive damage awards still face meaningful judicial scrutiny, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has struck down an $83 million punitive damages award that was entered against Liberty Mutual in Slagel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. However, the court left intact a $20 million award for emotional distress damages associated with alleged age discrimination and harassment.
$103 Million “Thermonuclear” Age Discrimination Verdict Overturned In Los Angeles
In a welcome reminder that eye-popping punitive damage awards still face meaningful judicial scrutiny, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has struck down an $83 million punitive damages award that was entered against Liberty Mutual in Slagel v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. However, the court left intact a $20 million award for emotional distress damages associated with alleged age discrimination and harassment.
From Best Practice to Exhibit A: The Hidden Risk of Workplace Investigations
Employers love a good investigation story—prompt response, outside counsel, thorough interviews, the whole compliance greatest-hits album. But the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Paknad v. Superior Court is a sharp reminder that if you plan to rely on your investigation in litigation, you may end up handing over the director’s cut.
From Best Practice to Exhibit A: The Hidden Risk of Workplace Investigations
Employers love a good investigation story—prompt response, outside counsel, thorough interviews, the whole compliance greatest-hits album. But the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Paknad v. Superior Court is a sharp reminder that if you plan to rely on your investigation in litigation, you may end up handing over the director’s cut.
Lights, Camera … Legal Power: Lively v. Wayfarer and the Expanding Reach of FEHA
The recent court opinion in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios LLC et al involves quite literally a Hollywood drama, but it’s chock-full of practical lessons for employers in and outside Tinseltown —particularly those with connections to California. The case touches on alleged worker misclassification, retaliation, and the geographic reach of California’s strict employment laws.
Lights, Camera … Legal Power: Lively v. Wayfarer and the Expanding Reach of FEHA
The recent court opinion in Lively v. Wayfarer Studios LLC et al is quite literally a Hollywood drama, but it’s chock-full of practical lessons for employers in and outside Tinseltown —particularly those with connections to California. The case touches on alleged worker misclassification, retaliation, and the geographic reach of California’s strict employment laws.
The Horror Continues: California’s Big “Nuclear Verdicts” Just Keep Coming!
California—where the sun shines, the waves crash, and juries keep dishing out verdicts so large they should come with their own seismic scale. Since our Special Halloween Edition on California’s “scariest” employment law verdicts, the trend toward “nuclear” and even “thermonuclear” jury awards (exceeding $100 million) has not only continued—it’s accelerated.
NLRB Relinquishes Jurisdiction Over SpaceX, Abandoning Yearslong Legal Battle
On February 9, 2026, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) dismissed its long-running unfair labor practice complaint against SpaceX that alleged SpaceX unlawfully terminated certain engineers. The Board’s dismissal letter states that the NLRB lacks jurisdiction over SpaceX, citing a recent opinion issued by the National Mediation Board (“NMB”).
Construction Employers Take Note: New York Expands Paid Family Leave Eligibility Beginning in 2027 | JD Supra
New York construction-industry employers should be aware of a significant change to the state’s Paid Family Leave (“PFL”) law. On December 19, Governor Kathy Hochul signed Assembly Bill 4727 (“A4727”) into law, expanding PFL eligibility to many construction workers who work for multiple employers under a collective bargaining agreement each year.
No Injunction For You: Third Circuit Rejects Employer Bid To Halt NLRB Case, Setting Up Circuit Split
Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Environment and Energy and Natural Resources topic(s) with readers working within the Banking & Credit industries In a significant decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held on December 3, 2025 that federal courts lack jurisdiction to issue injunctions that would halt ongoing National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") administrative proceedings—even when an employer frames its challenge as a constitutional attack on the NLRB's structure.
No Injunction for You: Third Circuit Rejects Employer Bid to Halt NLRB Case, Setting up Circuit Split | JD Supra
In a significant decision, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals held on December 3, 2025 that federal courts lack jurisdiction to issue injunctions that would halt ongoing National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) administrative proceedings—even when an employer frames its challenge as a constitutional attack on the NLRB’s structure. The ruling, Spring Creek Rehabilitation & Nursing Center LLC v.
California Again Resurrects Stale Sexual Assault Claims
Anthony J. Oncidi’s articles from Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular: within Employment and HR topic(s) with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel in United States with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Law Firm industries California's new AB 250 reopens the door for time-barred sexual assault claims, giving plaintiffs a two-year window starting Jan.
California again resurrects stale sexual assault claims | JD Supra
California's new AB 250 reopens the door for time-barred sexual assault claims, giving plaintiffs a two-year window starting Jan. 1, 2026, to revive old cases -- exposing private employers (but not public entities) to renewed liability for alleged "cover ups" through past confidentiality or nondisclosure agreements. California employers, brace yourselves.
Attorney’s Fees In Excess of $1,000 per Hour: The High Cost of Fighting Employment Claims in California | JD Supra
A recent California appellate decision is a stark reminder to employers of just how costly employment litigation has become in the Golden State: Bronshteyn v. California Department of Consumer Affairs.
Coming to an Employer Near You – the $16.90 Minimum Wage! | JD Supra
It’s that time of year, folks—the dog days of August, when vacations are booked, beaches are crowded, and the Department of Finance menacingly recalculates California’s minimum wage. As instructed by statute, August 1st is the date by which state officials must increase (it never goes down!) the minimum wage for the coming year. So, without further ado: As of January 1, 2026, California’s statewide minimum wage will rise to an eye-popping $16.90, a 40-cent increase over 2025.
It’s that time of year, folks—the dog days of August, when vacations are booked, beaches are crowded, and the Department of Finance menacingly recalculates California’s minimum wage. As instructed by statute, August 1st is the date by which state officials must increase (it never goes down!) the minimum wage for the coming year. So, without further ado: As of January 1, 2026, California’s statewide minimum wage will rise to an eye-popping $16.90, a 40-cent increase over 2025.
Ninth Circuit Rejects SAG-AFTRA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit
In an unpublished but nonetheless significant opinion, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the lower court's dismissal of a consolidated lawsuit filed by SAG-AFTRA members against their union, finding the claims time-barred and preempted.
SAG-AFTRA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit Rejected by Ninth Circuit | JD Supra
In an unpublished but nonetheless significant opinion, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a consolidated lawsuit filed by SAG-AFTRA members against their union, finding the claims time-barred and preempted.
Japan Plans to Amend Artificial Satellite and Launch Vehicle Acti
Read in Japanese. The Act on Launching Artificial Satellite and Launch Vehicle and Control of Artificial Satellite (Act No. 76 of 2016) (Space Activities Act) serves as the basic law for Japan’s space industry.
Federal Court Finds Text Messages Not Subject to TCPA’s DNC Requirements
Companies sued for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) violations should consider challenging the allegations at the outset by moving to dismiss, rather than conceding based on out-of-date precedent and answering the complaint. The TCPA is in a particularly volatile state as more courts are beginning to see merit in challenges to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Orders.
Ninth Circuit Rejects SAG-AFTRA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit | JD Supra
In an unpublished but nonetheless significant opinion, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a consolidated lawsuit filed by SAG-AFTRA members against their union, finding the claims time-barred and preempted.
Ninth Circuit Rejects SAG-AFTRA Vaccine Mandate Lawsuit
In an unpublished but nonetheless significant opinion, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a consolidated lawsuit filed by SAG-AFTRA members against their union, finding the claims time-barred and preempted.
New Notice Requirement For California Employers: Surviving Violent Crimes
As we've previously reported, the California Legislature last year passed and Governor Newsom signed into law AB 2499, which expanded existing leave requirements for California employers. Prior to passage of AB 2499, California already required employers: (1) to permit employees who are victims of certain violent crimes to obtain relief and (2) to provide such crime victim employees with reasonable accommodations for their safety at work.
New Notice Requirement for California Employers: Surviving Violent Crimes | JD Supra
As we’ve previously reported, the California Legislature last year passed and Governor Newsom signed into law AB 2499, which expanded existing leave requirements for California employers. Prior to passage of AB 2499, California already required employers: (1) to permit employees who are victims of certain violent crimes to obtain relief and (2) to provide such crime victim employees with reasonable accommodations for their safety at work.
Latest Moves by Federal Agencies Regarding Gender-Affirming Care: Risks Mount for Providers
Since day one, a policy priority of the Administration has been to discourage and prevent gender-affirming care for children and adolescents that involves surgery or medication. Recent actions show a concerted effort across multiple federal agencies to achieve this goal.
AI Bias Lawsuit Against Workday Reaches Next Stage as Court Grants Conditional Certification of ADEA Claim | JD Supra
A closely watched class and collective action against the HR management services company Workday, Inc. reached a new milestone recently, when the Northern District of California conditionally certified Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) claims on behalf of a sprawling collective believed to include millions of job applicants. In Mobley v. Workday, Inc., N.D. Cal.
AI Bias Lawsuit Against Workday Reaches Next Stage as Court Grants Conditional Certification of ADEA Claim
Jonathan Slowik represents employers in all aspects of litigation, with a particular emphasis in wage and hour class, collective, and representative actions, including those under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA).
Employer Victory in Motion to Compel Arbitration | JD Supra
On May 19, 2025, Proskauer attorneys successfully compelled to arbitration an employment discrimination lawsuit that had been filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court. While the former employee claimed that she never signed the arbitration agreement because she lacked access to her work email while on medical leave, the defendants established with emails showing that the employee actually did “access the . . .
Employer Victory in Motion to Compel Arbitration
On May 19, 2025, Proskauer attorneys successfully compelled to arbitration an employment discrimination lawsuit that had been filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court. While the former employee claimed that she never signed the arbitration agreement because she lacked access to her work email while on medical leave, the defendants established with emails showing that the employee actually did “access the . . .
What Would John Wilkes Booth Do? Mandatory COVID Vaxes For Actors
Although the threat of COVID-19 (remember that?) seems to have diminished considerably over the past five years, once upon a time in Hollywood many production companies (along with other employers) required employees to be vaccinated upon pain of losing their job.
What Would John Wilkes Booth Do? Mandatory COVID Vaxes for Actors | JD Supra
Although the threat of COVID-19 (remember that?) seems to have diminished considerably over the past five years, once upon a time in Hollywood many production companies (along with other employers) required employees to be vaccinated upon pain of losing their job.
What Would John Wilkes Booth Do? Mandatory COVID Vaxes for Actors | Open Legal Blog Archive
Although the threat of COVID-19 (remember that?) seems to have diminished considerably over the past five years, once upon a time in Hollywood many production companies (along with other employers) required employees to be vaccinated upon pain of losing their job.
Does An Arbitration Agreement Require The Employer's Signature? Read The Fine Print
The California Court of Appeal recently reminded employers in an unpublished (but nonetheless chastening) opinion of the importance of carefully drafting arbitration agreements. In Pich v. LaserAway, LLC et al, the court affirmed the trial court's denial of the employer's motion to compel a former employee's representative wage-and-hour suit to arbitration because the arbitration agreement in question was signed only by the employee—not the employer.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Dixie
Contact Dixie, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack