Skip To Main Content
Duncan Hubbard on Muck Rack

Duncan Hubbard

As seen in: JD Supra, The National Law Review, Lexology, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Duncan

Contact Duncan, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Non-Bank Lending In The Spotlight: UK House Of Lords Inquiry Into Systemic Risks And Market Stability

|
By Partha Pal, Tim Dolan, Kevin-Paul Deveau, Duncan Hubbard
| Mondaq
GT Greenberg Traurig, LLP More Greenberg Traurig, LLP has more than 2,850 attorneys across 49 locations in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Asia. The firm’s broad geographic and practice range enables the delivery of innovative and strategic legal services across borders and industries.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

An Option To Dispose Of Property Does Not Necessarily Give Rise To A Taxable Disposal

|
By Melinda Fellner, William Lo, Duncan Hubbard
| Mondaq
In the appeal case of Krishnamohan v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 346, the UK's First-Tier Tribunal ("FTT") determined that an agreement titled "Option Agreement" that was entered into to dispose of certain properties, does not, for capital gains tax purposes, constitute the grant of an option to dispose until the grantee's right to exercise the option is no longer contingent on events within the taxpayers control.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

An option to dispose of property does not necessarily give rise to a taxable disposal | JD Supra

|
By Duncan Hubbard, William Lo
| JD Supra
In the appeal case of Krishnamohan v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 346, the UK’s First-Tier Tribunal (“FTT”) determined that an agreement titled “Option Agreement” that was entered into to dispose of certain properties, does not, for capital gains tax purposes, constitute the grant of an option to dispose until the grantee’s right to exercise the option is no longer contingent on events within the taxpayers control.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 60 articles