Skip To Main Content
Emilie Jones on Muck Rack

Emilie Jones

As seen in: MDPI, Society19, Pinsent Masons, Out-Law.com, lawsociety.org.uk, The Oberlin Review, WarwickshireWorld
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Emilie

Contact Emilie, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Climate litigation enters a new phase as corporate liability claims gain momentum

|
By Emilie Jones
| Out-Law.com Verified
The research body’s latest analysis of climate litigation trends (78 pages/ 12.3 MB PDF), which is published annually, paints a picture of a rapidly evolving field. While the growth in climate cases remains significant, the more notable development is the increasing sophistication of the claims being brought, the wider range of organisations being targeted, and the growing complexity of the legal and political questions businesses are having to navigate.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Commercial Court clarifies test for restricting document access under transparency pilot

|
By Emilie Jones
| Out-Law.com Verified
The ruling is believed to be the first reported decision under the new so-called 'transparency pilot' in CPR Practice Direction 51ZH, on what factors the courts will take into consideration when deciding whether to make an FMO. The pilot scheme, which came into force in January and operates in the Commercial Court, Financial List and London Circuit Commercial Court, is designed to make it easier for the public to access certain documents in commercial litigation in England and Wales.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Legal advice privilege covers intra-client communications, High Court confirms

|
By Emilie Jones
| Out-Law.com Verified
The ‘client team’, for the purposes of legal advice privilege, comprises people whom a business has authorised to seek and receive legal advice on its behalf. The English High Court ruling confirms that legal advice privilege will cover all confidential internal documents which are sent between or created by members of that ‘client team’ for the dominant purpose of seeking legal advice – even if not actually sent to a lawyer nor evidencing the substance of the advice.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 78 licensed articles (83 Total)