Skip To Main Content
Fadlalla G. Elfadaly on Muck Rack

Fadlalla G. Elfadaly

As seen in: Wiley Online Library, Thorax, European Respiratory Journal
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Fadlalla G.

Contact Fadlalla G., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Locally correct confidence intervals for discrete sampling distributions

|
By Paul H. Garthwaite, Fadlalla G. Elfadaly, Maha W. Moustafa
| Wiley Online Library Verified
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT There is no conflict of interest.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Chronic airflow obstruction attributable to poverty in the multinational Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study

|
By Jaymini Patel, Cosetta Minelli, Fadlalla G. Elfadaly, Kevin Mortimer
| Thorax Verified
Twitter @jaymini31 Collaborators The BOLD (Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease) Collaborative Research Group members Albania: Hasan Hafizi (PI), Anila Aliko, Donika Bardhi, Holta Tafa, Natasha Thanasi, Arian Mezini, Alma Teferici, Dafina Todri, Jolanda Nikolla and Rezarta Kazasi (Tirana University Hospital Shefqet Ndroqi, Albania); Algeria: Hamid Hacene Cherkaski (PI), Amira Bengrait, Tabarek Haddad, Ibtissem Zgaoula, Maamar Ghit, Abdelhamid Roubhia, Soumaya Boudra, Feryal Atoui, Randa...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Locally correct confidence intervals for a binomial proportion: A new criteria for an interval estimator

|
By Fadlalla G. Elfadaly, Paul H. Garthwaite, Maha W. Moustafa
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Abstract Well-recommended methods of forming ‘confidence intervals’ for a binomial proportion give interval estimates that do not actually meet the definition of a confidence interval, in that their coverages are sometimes lower than the nominal confidence level. The methods are favoured because their intervals have a shorter average length than the Clopper-Pearson (gold-standard) method, whose intervals really are confidence intervals.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 5 articles