Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Commentary Ultimately, the same considerations that governed appellate practice before the Federal Circuit for in-person hearings will govern remote practice. However, increased attention to detail both in briefing and presentation of argument should be given to make up for any shortcomings of remote argument. U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Courtesy of U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Law360 (September 26, 2019, 12:51 PM EDT) -- In part one of this two-part series, we discussed the latest U.S. International Trade Commission developments involving Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, the public interest and importation. In part two, we will examine ITC developments on domestic industry, as well as recent ITC decisions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and their practical impact, if any, on Section 337 practice.
Law360 (September 25, 2019, 3:03 PM EDT) -- Despite a brief hiatus stemming from the government shutdown, 2019 has already been a very busy year in Section 337 practice at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Two administrative law judges considered whether the public interest weighed against remedial orders in two separate but related proceedings, and each ALJ reached a different conclusion.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
