Skip to main content
Houghton Street on Muck Rack

Houghton Street

As seen in: Color Research & Application, Wiley Online Library, Cambridge University Press & Assessment, Oxford Academic, Oxford University Press (OUP), Political Science Research and Methods (PSRM), Elsevier, Journal of Business Research, Journal of Business Venturing, Journal of Corporate Finance and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Houghton

Contact Houghton, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Clarifying by declassifying: removing the buzzwords from behavioral public policy

|
By Houghton Street
| Oxford Academic Verified
At the time of writing, behavioral public policy—i.e., the use of the findings of behavioral science to justify or to use as inputs to inform the design of policy interventions—as a distinct subfield of public policy remains a relatively nascent endeavor, with its origins dating to around 2010. Over its short history, the field has been defined by buzzwords used, in part, to attract attention.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Inequality bands: seventy-five years of measuring income inequality in Latin America

|
By Houghton Street, Francisco G, Saadiyat Campus
| Oxford Academic Verified
There are many ‘windows’ through which a country’s income distribution can be observed and its inequality measured.1 Useful information about people’s incomes can be obtained from at least five sources: censuses; national account statistics; household surveys; tax records and other administrative datasets on social security and wages.2 Sometimes, researchers prefer to bypass income altogether and examine the distribution of consumption expenditures, which come primarily from household...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Programmed differently? Testing for gender differences in Python programming style and quality on GitHub

|
By Houghton Street
| Oxford Academic Verified
Despite its title, Open-Source Software (OSS) has remained essentially closed to women, who comprise less than 10% of its contributors. Even in communities with few or no barriers to entry, such as GitHub, women are severely underrepresented across programming languages. Women represent 4.8% of core developers for projects based on Python, 4.5% for C++, and 4.2% for Java (Trinkenreich et al., 2021).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 30 licensed articles (37 Total)