Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Get in touch with Inbar
Contact Inbar, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck RackActions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Articles
Correction: Comparative effectiveness of varying hyperbaric oxygen protocols in the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion
Correction to: Eye https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04298-3, published online 10 February 2026 In this article the author name has been misspelled. Ist should read “Attal” and not “Atal”. The original article has been corrected. About this article Gur, I., Gur, I., Gitzman, M. et al. Correction: Comparative effectiveness of varying hyperbaric oxygen protocols in the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion. Eye (2026).
Comparative effectiveness of varying hyperbaric oxygen protocols in the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion - Eye
Abstract The comparative effectiveness of different hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy doses in the acute treatment of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) has not been evaluated. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the efficacy of an initial 2.8ATA HBO session (HBO18) to the more prevalent 2.0ATA protocol (HBO10). Excluded were patients with suspected inflammatory arteritis or branch retinal artery occlusion, and when HBO was medically contraindicated.
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Inbar
Contact Inbar, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack