Skip To Main Content
Isabella Dissing on Muck Rack

Isabella Dissing

As seen in: Maddocks on the Mic
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Isabella

Contact Isabella, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

End of the road for Volkswagen in Takata airbags class action —…

|
By Christopher Marsh, Susanne Rakoczy, Isabella Dissing, Chloe Brighton
| Maddocks on the Mic
On 8 February 2024, the High Court refused lead plaintiff Phillip Dwyer special leave to appeal the NSW Court of Appeal’s ruling in Dwyer v Volkswagen Group Australia Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCA 211. In the September 2023 decision, the NSW Court of Appeal held that Volkswagen had not breached the consumer guarantee of acceptable quality under section 54 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) due to its installation of the globally re-called Takata airbags in their vehicles.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

The use and development by or on behalf of the Victorian Minister for…

|
By Amelia Hunter, Susanne Rakoczy, Isabella Dissing, John Rantino
| Maddocks on the Mic
On 1 February 2024 a Governor in Council Order made on the recommendation of the Minister for Planning was gazetted under s 16 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Act) with the effect that the use or development of land carried out by or on behalf of the Minister for Children is exempt from all planning schemes.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Another native title lesson for proponents: Harvey v Minister for…

|
By Susanne Rakoczy, Isabella Dissing, John Rantino, Shaun Temby
| Maddocks on the Mic
In its recent decision, the High Court has resolved differing interpretations of the proper meaning of ‘right to mine’ and ‘infrastructure facility’ as well as highlighting the repercussions of not following the correct future act process under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 3 articles