Jason Haas on Muck Rack

Jason Haas

Paso Robles
As seen in: Tablas Creek, Wiley Online Library, MDPI, Silicon Valley Business Journal, Wine-Searcher, JD Supra, OnMilwaukee, JancisRobinson.com, The Cureus Journal of Medical Science, Westlaw Today, The Climbing Zine
Second-generation proprietor @TablasCreek Vineyard in Paso Robles, CA. Vermont native. (Largely former) Ultimate frisbee player. Dad.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Jason

Contact Jason, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Understanding for whom wholesale wine sales works, and for whom it doesn't

|
By Jason Haas
| Tablas Creek
I had the pleasure of being asked to participate on a panel at the always-valuable WiVi Central Coast industry conference here in Paso Robles a few weeks ago. The subject was the right strategies for wineries in the wholesale distribution market, and I was joined on stage by DAOU's Neb Lukic, Alma Rosa's Stefan Matulich, and O'Neill's Maeve Pesquera, who moderated our discussion. Thanks, Amanda Wittstrom Higgins, for snapping and sharing the photo at the top of this post.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

A Temporary Victory: What the New Anthropic and Meta Rulings Actually Reveal About a Fair Use Defense for Companies Accused of Using Copyrighted Works to Train Generative AI | Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP - JDSupra

|
By Jason Haas, Banu Naraghi
| JD Supra
Until two weeks ago, no U.S. court had ruled on whether training generative AI models on copyrighted works could constitute a fair use, or if the simple act of training such models without a license would constitute copyright infringement. Two new summary judgment rulings out of the Northern District of California have now set the stage for how future courts may interpret fair use in the context of AI training—Richard Kadrey, et al., v. Meta Platforms, Inc. and Andrea Bartz, et al. v. Anthropic PBC.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Kadrey v. Meta: The First Major Test of Fair Use in the Age of Generative AI | JD Supra

|
By Jason Haas
| JD Supra
On May 1, 2025, a federal courtroom in San Francisco became ground zero for one of the most consequential copyright hearings in recent memory. The three hour hearing in Kadrey v. Meta Platforms marked the first major judicial test of whether using copyrighted works to train generative AI systems—like Meta’s LLaMA models—qualifies as “fair use” under U.S. copyright law.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 296 licensed articles (297 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Jason

Contact Jason, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified