Julian Mark on Muck Rack

Julian Mark

Verified
Washington, D.C.
As seen in: The Washington Post, Medium, MSN, MSN Brasil, MSN Ireland, UOL, Estadão, Terra, The Independent (UK), Wiley Online Library, Yahoo Canada and
Reporter @washingtonpost covering the U.S. Supreme Court. Opinions are mine. Signal: jules.535

Get in touch with Julian

Contact Julian, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Julian Mark’s Biography

Read Full Bio →

Writing for Mission Local, covering San Francisco's Mission district.

Articles

Supreme Court restores man’s conviction in murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz

|
By Julian Mark Verified
| ABA Journal Verified
Home Syndicated Supreme Court restores man’s conviction… Supreme Court restores man’s conviction in murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz A newspaper with a photograph of Etan Patz is displayed at a makeshift memorial in the SoHo neighborhood of New York, May 28, 2012, where Patz lived before his disappearance on May 25, 1979.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Supreme Court restores man’s conviction in murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz

|
By Julian Mark Verified
| The Washington Post Verified
Supreme Court restores man’s conviction in murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz (washingtonpost.com) Supreme Court restores man’s conviction in murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz By Julian Mark 2026062217070200 The Supreme Court on Monday restored the conviction of the man found guilty of kidnapping and murdering 6-year-old Etan Patz in a case that captivated the nation nearly 50 years ago.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Government can’t restrict gun ownership over marijuana use, Supreme Court rules Original

|
By Julian Mark Verified
| The Morning Sun Verified
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... By Julian Mark THE WASHINGTON POST The Supreme Court on Thursday found that a Texas man could not be prosecuted under a federal law that prohibits regular users of controlled substances, such as marijuana, from possessing firearms. In a unanimous decision, the justices found that the law’s “habitual user” provision was inconsistent with the Constitution’s right to bear arms.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (9) Issue with article?
See all 2,218 licensed articles (2,428 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified