Kaamil Khalfan on Muck Rack

Kaamil Khalfan

As seen in: JD Supra, Lexology, Mondaq, Law360 Canada
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Kaamil

Contact Kaamil, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

The risks of endorsements: Ambiguity of policy in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co. - Law360 Canada

|
By Christine A. Viney, Meg Bennett, Kaamil Khalfan, Gracie Boser
| Law360 Canada
By Christine A. Viney, Meg Bennett, Kaamil Khalfan and Gracie Boser ( February 27, 2026, 3:38 PM EST) -- In part one (The risks of endorsements: Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co.), we discussed the background of the coverage dispute in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co., 2026 SCC 3, and identified and analyzed the dissenting finding of Justice Andromache Karakatsanis and Justice Suzanne Côté that the policy was ambiguous.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

The risks of endorsements: Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co.

|
By Christine A. Viney, Meg Bennett, Kaamil Khalfan, Gracie Boser
| Law360 Canada
By Christine A. Viney, Meg Bennett, Kaamil Khalfan and Gracie Boser ( February 26, 2026, 3:52 PM EST) -- In its 7-1-1 decision in Emond v. Trillium Mutual Insurance Co., 2026 SCC 3 (Emond), the Supreme Court of Canada found that a homeowners’ insurance policy with an included guaranteed rebuilding cost endorsement did not cover the full costs of complying with updated regulatory requirements because those costs were clearly limited in the body of the policy....
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (7) Issue with article?

Emond: Rebuilding Dreams Or Interpreting Realities? The Supreme Court Weighs In

|
By Christine A. Viney, Margaret Bennett, Kaamil Khalfan
| Mondaq
Bennett Jones LLP are most popular: within Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Consumer Protection topic(s) with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives in Canada with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Business & Consumer Services and Insurance industries The Supreme Court of Canada recently released its decision in Emond v Trillium Mutual Insurance Co, 2026 SCC 3 (Emond), offering important clarity on how insurance policies are interpreted when endorsements...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 14 articles

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Kaamil

Contact Kaamil, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified