L. Brock Trulove

No. The Alabama State Bar makes clear that AI “recontextualizes” lawyers’ existing obligations under the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct (ARPC) rather than creating new ones. Lawyers must have a reasonable understanding of what an AI tool does, what it cannot do, and how its outputs can fail. Those responsibilities fall squarely within a lawyer’s duty of competence.

The Alabama State Bar recently released updated guidance on the ethical use of artificial intelligence. While the guidance does not create any new ethics rules, it explains how lawyers’ existing professional responsibilities apply to AI tools that are now part of everyday legal practice. Here are a few key takeaways. No. The Alabama State Bar makes clear that AI “recontextualizes” lawyers’ existing obligations under the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct (ARPC) rather than creating new ones.

Introduction The boardroom has become a central locus of responsibility in the federal government's campaign against money laundering. Once considered a compliance function delegated to operational staff, anti-money laundering (AML) oversight has been elevated to the highest echelons of corporate governance, with regulators and prosecutors increasingly focusing their attention on the directors and executives who set institutional priorities.