Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Added by Carol Miller on March 21, 2021. Saved under Columns, Education, Opinion Tags: Ethnic Studies, Larry Sand. Education By Larry Sand and Lia Rensin On March 5th, the California Department of Education released a fourth draft of its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum. Not surprisingly, letters opposing Critical Race Theory and Critical Ethnic Studies comprised the #1 concern about the ESMC.
The California Department of Education on March 5 released the fourth draft of its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum. Not surprisingly, letters opposing critical race theory and critical ethnic studies comprised the number one concern about the latest version of the ESMC. And yet more than half of those letters were not counted by department officials, and more than 100 pages of suggested edits were likewise completely ignored.
On March 5th, the California Department of Education released a fourth draft of its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum. Not surprisingly, letters opposing Critical Race Theory and Critical Ethnic Studies comprised the #1 concern about the ESMC. And yet, more than half of those letters were not counted by the CDE, and more than 100 pages of suggested edits were likewise completely ignored.
On March 5th, the California Department of Education released a fourth draft of its Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum. Not surprisingly, letters opposing Critical Race Theory and Critical Ethnic Studies comprised the #1 concern about the ESMC. And yet, more than half of those letters were not counted by the CDE, and more than 100 pages of suggested edits were likewise completely ignored.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
