Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Get in touch with Mason
Contact Mason, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck RackActions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Articles
A Teapot Steeped with Dicta: An Update on In re Maatita and Design Definiteness
“The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has slowly been chipping away at [the USPTO’s] limited reading of In re Maatita.” Disclosure: The authors of this article represented the Applicant, PUMA SE, in the ex parte appeal before the Patent Trial & Appeal Board in Ex parte Silva, Appeal 2024-000238 (P.T.A.B. September 27, 2024), which is discussed below.
Sometimes Less is More: Patentability of “Simple” Designs | JD Supra
When there are fewer design elements in a design claim or when the individual elements of the design seem commonplace in isolation, it can be easy to overlook the inventive effort that went into developing a design.
Junker v. Medical Components, Inc.: Pre-filing Offers for Sale Trigger Patent “On-Sale Bar” | JD Supra
A recent Federal Circuit decision, Junker v. Med. Components, Inc., No. 2021-1649 (Feb. 10, 2022), serves as a warning to prospective filers that making pre-filing offers for sale, or engaging in discussions for future sales, can be detrimental to one’s ability to obtain both design and utility patents.
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Mason
Contact Mason, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack