Skip To Main Content
Nabeel S. Qureshi on Muck Rack

Nabeel S. Qureshi

Brooklyn, New York
As seen in: Wiley Online Library, WIRED Magazine, The New Statesman, Journal of Healthcare Management
Covers:  Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Biomedical Informatics, Technology Policy
make yourself proud

Get in touch with Nabeel S.

Contact Nabeel S., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Nabeel S. Qureshi’s Biography

Read Full Bio →

Nabeel S. Qureshi is a technologist and writer focused on agency, AI, and progress. He is currently building Fleet Health and serves as a Visiting Scholar at the Mercatus Center. A veteran of the "hard tech" world, Nabeel was an early executive at GoCardless and led critical public health operations at Palantir. He writes about the intersection of technology and the humanities at nabeelqu.co.

Nabeel S. Qureshi’s Journalist Portfolio

Waluigi, Carl Jung, and the Case for Moral AI

Waluigi, Carl Jung, and the Case for Moral AI

Nintendo's Luigi has a chaos-causing alter ego. AI's shadow could put humanity at risk-but can be contained.

View article →

View article →

Articles

What Makes Art Great?

|
By Nabeel S. Qureshi
| nabeelqu.co
Tilework inside Shah Mosque, Isfahan. Shakespeare is excellent, whereas AI writing is — at least, for now — dull. AIs can now write much of our code, review legal contracts, and perform various impressive feats; they have achieved gold-medal-level scores at the IMO. But, as of this writing, I am not aware of a truly interesting AI-written poem or even essay. Why? This breaks down into two questions: What makes texts good? Why is it difficult for AI to do that?
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

A Multicomponent Approach to Screening for Dementia in Older Hospitalized Patients

|
By Zaldy S. Tan, Nabeel S. Qureshi, Nancy L Sicotte
| Wiley Online Library Verified
Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Supporting Information Filename Description jgs70420-sup-0001-Supinfo.pdfPDF document, 402.1 KB Table S1: Comparison of characteristics of hospitalized patients by screening results. Figure S1: Screening rates for the 4AT and AD8 over time. Figure S2: 4AT scores in percent among (a) those identified with potential cognitive impairment, no dementia (CIND) and (b) those identified with potential dementia.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 2 licensed articles (4 Total)