Nachshon Cohen

Composing messages in chatbot interactions is often time-consuming, making autocompletion an appealing way to reduce user effort. Different users have different preferences and therefore different expectations from autocompletion solutions. We study how personalization can improve the autocompletion process, evaluating four schemes defined along two axes: generation vs. ranking, and prior messages vs. external features.

Training large language models (LLMs) for external tool usage is a rapidly expanding field, with recent research focusing on generating synthetic data to address the shortage of available data. However, the absence of systematic data quality checks poses complications for properly training and testing models. To that end, we propose two approaches for assessing the reliability of data for training LLMs to use external tools. The first approach uses intuitive, human-defined correctness criteria.

Voice assistants have become ubiquitous in smart devices allowing users to instantly access information via voice questions. While extensive research has been conducted in question answering for voice search, little attention has been paid on how to enable proactive recommendations from a voice assistant to its users. This is a highly challenging problem that often leads to user friction, mainly due to recommendations provided to the users at the wrong time.