Skip To Main Content
Oliver Eagleton on Muck Rack

Oliver Eagleton

Verified
As seen in: Tribune Magazine, MSN UK, The New York Times, The Guardian, TIME, Yahoo News Malaysia, Aol, Yahoo, The New Statesman, The Wire (India), EIN News and
Editor of @tribunemagazine. Contributing Editor at @phenomenalworld.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Oliver

Contact Oliver, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Country-Fried Ulster

|
By Oliver Eagleton Verified, Olufemi Taiwo
| The Baffler Verified
On a stormy Sunday in January, I decided to visit my local megachurch, a sprawling slate-gray complex called Green Pastures in the Northern Irish town of Ballymena, where hundreds gather every week to be washed in the blood of the lamb.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Populizam kao prazan pojam

|
By Oliver Eagleton Verified
| Tacno.net Verified
Dok se dva kraja političkog spektra udaljavaju jedan od drugog, desnica pobeđuje širom zapadnog sveta, a levica nikako da se oporavi od uzastopnih poraza. Možda je sada dobar trenutak da potražimo bolji opis ove neravnoteže moći i načina da se ona ublaži. Pravu prirodu populizma teško je razdvojiti od napetog diskursa koji ga okružuje. Populisti pridaju ogroman značaj jeziku: oni imaju zvučne slogane i obraćaju se direktno „narodu“.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

‘Populism’: we used to know what it meant. Now the defining word of our era has lost its meaning

|
By Oliver Eagleton Verified
| Inkl
“Populism” may well have been the defining word of the previous decade: a shorthand for the insurgent parties that came to prominence in the 2010s, challenging the dominance of the liberal centre. But no sooner had it become the main rubric for discussing both the far left and far right than commentators began to question its validity: worrying that it was too vague, or too pejorative, or fuelling the forces to which it referred.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (4) Issue with article?
See all 88 licensed articles (128 Total)