Skip to main content
Peter H. Ditto on Muck Rack

Peter H. Ditto

As seen in: The Washington Post, Memory Studies, Frontiers, Scientific American, Taylor & Francis Online, Science Magazine, Dialnet - Universidad de La Rioja, Annual Reviews Journal
Can you make a holiday card, recounting the events in the life of a family during that year, in a series of one-hundred and forty character tweets? You bet we c
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Peter H.

Contact Peter H., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Of preferences and priors: Motivated reasoning in partisans’ evaluations of scientific evidence

|
By Jared Celniker, Peter H. Ditto
| Dialnet - Universidad de La Rioja
Ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Buscar en la ayuda Of preferences and priors: Motivated reasoning in partisans’ evaluations of scientific evidence Autores: Jared B. Celniker, Peter H. Ditto Localización: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ISSN 0022-3514, ISSN-e 1939-1315, Vol. 127, Nº. 5, 2024, págs.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Partisan Bias in Political Judgment

|
By Peter H. Ditto, Jared Celniker, Shiri Spitz Siddiqi, Mertcan Güngör
| Annual Reviews Journal
1932 x This is a required field Please enter a valid email address Approval was a Success Invalid data An Error Occurred Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error Annual Reviews: http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-030424-122723 10.1146/annurev-psych-030424-122723 SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (4) Issue with article?

Moral foundations are better predictors of belief in COVID-19 conspiracy theories than the Big Five personality traits

|
By Shahid Beheshti, Mohammad Mahdi, Mark Hallahan, Peter H. Ditto
| Frontiers
Pegah Nejat* Ali Heirani-Tabas Mohammad Mahdi Nazarpour Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Upon the sudden outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic, various conspiracy theories regarding the virus proliferated in the social media. This study focused on the sociodemographic, personality, and moral predictors of these beliefs.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 18 articles