Skip To Main Content
Romtin Parvaresh on Muck Rack

Romtin Parvaresh

As seen in: JD Supra, Mondaq, LexBlog
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Romtin

Contact Romtin, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Silence Is Golden: Case Dismissal Affirmed Under Five-year Rule Because Defendants Need Not Object To An Untimely Trial Date

|
By Romtin Parvaresh, Daniel Whang
| Mondaq
Seyfarth Shaw LLP are most popular: within Compliance and Consumer Protection topic(s) There is truth to the proverb that “a closed mouth catches no flies.” In Randolph v. Trustees of the California State University, 3rd App. Dist. C102901 (Jan. 15, 2026), the defendants sat silent when the trial court set a trial date after the five-year statutory deadline to bring a case to trial. Once the deadline passed, they successfully moved to dismiss.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Silence Is Golden: Case Dismissal Affirmed Under Five-year Rule Because Defendants Need Not Object to an Untimely Trial Date | JD Supra

|
By Romtin Parvaresh, Daniel Whang
| JD Supra
There is truth to the proverb that “a closed mouth catches no flies.” In Randolph v. Trustees of the California State University, 3rd App. Dist. C102901 (Jan. 15, 2026), the defendants sat silent when the trial court set a trial date after the five-year statutory deadline to bring a case to trial. Once the deadline passed, they successfully moved to dismiss.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Effecting The EFAA: California Appellate Courts Make It Harder To Enforce Arbitration Agreements In Cases Alleging Sexual Assault Or Sexual Harassment | Seyfarth Shaw LLP - JDSupra

|
By Romtin Parvaresh, Daniel Whang
| JD Supra
Seyfarth Synopsis:  In line with recent anti-arbitration trends, the California Court of Appeal recently decided two cases – Doe v. Second Street Corp. and Liu v. Miniso Depot CA, Inc. – that apply the federal Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act to limit the enforceability of arbitration agreements in cases alleging sexual assault and sexual harassment. Second Street Corp.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 16 articles