Skip To Main Content
see Sohl-Dickstein on Muck Rack

see Sohl-Dickstein

As seen in: Oxford Academic
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with see

Contact see, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Why Getty Images v Stability AI got secondary copyright infringement wrong

|
By James Hall, see Sohl-Dickstein
| Oxford Academic Verified
In November 2025, one of the most anticipated judgments of the year, Getty Images v Stability AI,1 was handed down from the High Court. It represented the first time that generative artificial intelligence (AI) was examined through the lens of IP law in the UK. Though much was expected of this case, its scope narrowed throughout the litigation.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 1 articles