Skip To Main Content
Seth Barrett Tillman on Muck Rack

Seth Barrett Tillman

As seen in: The New York Times, The Washington Post, Newsweek, The Atlantic, Yahoo, Irish Examiner, TheJournal.ie, Cato Institute, Belfast News Letter, Legal Insurrection and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Seth Barrett

Contact Seth Barrett, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Different Rules for Women who Kill

|
By Seth Barrett Tillman
| Quadrant Online Verified
That Lindsay Clancy strangled her children isn't in dispute.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

CHAT GPT versus GROK

|
By Seth Barrett Tillman
| blogspot.com
CHAT GPT: Tillman asking: Was ex parte merryman a federal circuit court decision? ChatGPT said: Short answer: Yes — technically. Explanation: Ex parte Merryman (1861) was not a U.S. Supreme Court decision. It was issued by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney acting in his capacity as a circuit judge for the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland. At that time, Supreme Court justices “rode circuit” and presided over the federal circuit courts.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Strained (and Sloppy) Readings of the Constitution and Strained (and Sloppy) Readings of Hamilton’s Federalist No. 77

|
By Seth Barrett Tillman
| blogspot.com
Extract from Michael Stokes Paulsen, The Interpretive Force of Alexander Hamilton’s Early Expositions of Presidential Power, 53 Pepp. L. Rev. (forth. circa 2026) (posted: Oct. 24, 2025)) (manuscript at 18 n.46) (bold added), <https://ssrn.com/abstract=5648310>: [I]ronically, the removal-power issue is one on which Hamilton, writing as Publius in The Federalist No. 77, can be read as suggesting, sloppily, that the Senate’s role in confirming appointments operated to limit removals as well.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 44 licensed articles (47 Total)