Skip To Main Content
Shanjot Brar on Muck Rack

Shanjot Brar

As seen in: Nature, Wiley Online Library
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Shanjot

Contact Shanjot, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Are Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines Accounting for Adults With Multiple Chronic Diseases? A Systematic Review

|
By Shanjot Brar, Martin Dawes, Olivia L. Tseng, Hetesh Ranchod
| Wiley Online Library Verified
AGREE Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation C-CHANGE Canadian Cardiovascular Harmonized National Guidelines Endeavour CDSS Clinical decision-making support systems CMA Canadian Medical Association EMR Electronic medical record LOE Level of evidence NICE National Institute for Health and Care Excellence NNT Number needed to treat PCPs Primary care physicians PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols QALY Quality-adjusted life years SD...
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Knowledge, attitudes and demand toward cardiovascular polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: cross-sectional survey of patients - European Journal of Human Genetics

|
By Liam R. Brunham, Shanjot Brar
| Nature Verified
Abstract The goal of this study was to assess patients’ prior exposure and current level of knowledge of polygenic risk scores (PRSs). We also explored reactions to receiving a high-risk or low-risk score, and gauged the overall attitudes and demand patients have with regards to PRSs. We developed an online investigator-designed survey based on existing validated tools in genetic testing. There were two versions of the survey, one including a hypothetical high-risk PRS and one with a low-risk PRS.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 2 articles