Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
The classic categories of acrodonty, pleurodonty, and thecodonty have been used as descriptors, as well as phylogenetic characters ( Zaher & Rippel, 1999 ), and continue in even the latest literature ( Jenkins et al., 2017 ) but have been called into question by Estes & Charles (1988) who suggested these categories are artificial and are not likely representative of natural groupings.
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
