Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Siri Göpel
Population-based comparison of post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and health-related quality of life across pandemic periods: Omicron era versus early pandemic
Abstract Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) may vary across pandemic phases. We compared the prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 symptom clusters following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the early pandemic and during the Omicron era using a population-based approach. The EPILOC study enrolled individuals aged 18–65 years who tested PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2 during the early pandemic, between October 2020 and April 2021, in defined geographic regions within Baden-Württemberg.
Persistent symptoms and clinical findings in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19/post-COVID-19 syndrome in the second year after acute infection: A population-based, nested case-control study
Loading metrics Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article Citation: Peter RS, Nieters A, Göpel S, Merle U, Steinacker JM, Deibert P, et al. (2025) Persistent symptoms and clinical findings in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19/post-COVID-19 syndrome in the second year after acute infection: A population-based, nested case-control study. PLoS Med 22(1): e1004511.
Persistent symptoms and clinical findings in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19/post-COVID-19 syndrome in the second year after acute infection: A population-based, nested case-control study
Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article Figures Citation: Peter RS, Nieters A, Göpel S, Merle U, Steinacker JM, Deibert P, et al. (2025) Persistent symptoms and clinical findings in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19/post-COVID-19 syndrome in the second year after acute infection: A population-based, nested case-control study. PLoS Med 22(1): e1004511.
Persistent symptoms and clinical findings in adults with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19/post-COVID-19 syndrome in the second year after acute infection: population-based, nested case-control study
The authors have declared no competing interest. This work was funded by the Baden-Wuerttemberg Federal State Ministry of Science and Art (grant number MR/S028188/1). I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Evaluating BLOOMY and SOFA scores in hospitalised patients - Authors' reply
We thank Nicole Benzoni and colleagues for their Correspondence and for sharing the results of an assessment of the 14-day mortality Bloodstream Infection due to Multidrug-resistant Organisms: Multicenter Study on Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes (BLOOMY) score in a retrospective cohort of US-based hospitalised patients with cancer and bloodstream infections.
Development and validation of BLOOMY prediction scores for 14-day and 6-month mortality in hospitalised adults with bloodstream infections: a multicentre, prospective, cohort study
Summary Background The burden of bloodstream infections remains high worldwide and cannot be confined to short-term in-hospital mortality. We aimed to develop scores to predict short-term and long-term mortality in patients with bloodstream infections.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Siri
Contact Siri, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack