Skip to main content
Smith Brittingham on Muck Rack

Smith Brittingham

As seen in: World IP Review
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Smith

Contact Smith, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

|
By Smith Brittingham, Cory Bell, Kara Specht
| finnegan.com
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 11, 2026 WASHINGTON, DC—Finnegan has secured a decisive victory for Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, as the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) issued its Final Determination in Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1414, confirming that Innoscience’s current gallium nitride (GaN) power devices do not infringe Infineon’s patents and may continue to be imported and sold in the United States without restriction.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

ITC breaks new ground in IPR decision

|
By Smith Brittingham
| World IP Review Verified
Izf / Shutterstock.com Litigators should pay close attention to a recent decision from the US International Trade Commission, Smith Brittingham of Finnegan writes. Litigators sometimes question whether post-grant procedures at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) can help companies facing patent infringement allegations in the US International Trade Commission (ITC).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 2 articles