Skip To Main Content
Steve Quinlivan on Muck Rack

Steve Quinlivan

As seen in: Center Republican, The Minnesota Star Tribune, New York Law Journal, Law360, JD Supra, LexBlog, Law360 UK
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Steve

Contact Steve, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Terraform, Do Kwon to Pay $4.5B in Penalties in Settlement Agreement With SEC

|
By Patrick Smith, Maydeen Merino Verified, Steve Quinlivan, Kelly Stout Verified, Andrew Denney Verified
| feedblitz.com
Cryptocurrency company Terraform Labs and its founder Do Kwon, which a Manhattan jury found liable on civil fraud charges in April, have brokered a settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the defendants to pay a combined $4.5 billion in penalties.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

10b-5 Litigation Questions Follow Justices' Macquarie Ruling

|
By Steve Quinlivan, Sean Colligan
| Law360 Verified
ADVERTISEMENT Don't want ads? Subscribe or login now. By Steve Quinlivan and Sean Colligan (May 1, 2024, 2:12 PM EDT) -- On April 12, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. Moab Partners LP that failure to make management discussion and analysis disclosures required by Item 303 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation S-K does not violate Rule 10b-5(b)....
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (10) Issue with article?

Supreme Court: Rule 10b-5 Does Not Cover Pure Omissions

|
By Steve Quinlivan
| LexBlog
In Macquarie Infrastructure Corp., et al., v. Moab Partners, L. P., et. al, a unanimous United States Supreme Court held that failure to make MD&A disclosures required by Item 303 of Regulation S-K does not violate Rule 10b-5(b). The Court reiterated the tenet of Basic Inc. v. Levinson that “Silence, absent a duty to disclose, is not misleading under Rule 10b–5.” The facts are straightforward.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (3) Issue with article?
See all 69 licensed articles (70 Total)