Professor-Professional Development-Univ Mississippi. Am Care Guy.🎙Podcaster.🥘Foodie. Love of Learning/Curiosity/Hope. Host @PharmacyFika Podcast. He/him.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Articles by Stuart T. Haines
AACP Argus Commission Forecast 2025
aUniversity of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN, USA bTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA cUniversity of Mississippi School of Pharmacy, Jackson, MS, USA dSt. John’s University, Queens, NY, USA eUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA fUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA gUniversity of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA hUniversity of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC, USA iUniversity of...
Reconsidering Pharmacy: We Need to Turn Career Regret into Career Options
Declining interest in pharmacy as a career is a growing concern. This commentary investigates the factors contributing to career regret among pharmacy graduates, based on data from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) National Graduating Student Survey. We identify three key contributing factors: workplace environment, professional identity formation, and marketing of the Doctor of Pharmacy degree.
Development Rx Digest
Tools for Achieving Personal and Professional Success Finding Renewal in Turbulent Times by Stuart T. Haines A career in pharmacy used to be a "sure bet." Until recently, if you had a pharmacy degree and a license, you could find gainful employment almost anywhere. Indeed, in the late 1990's, there was a dramatic shortage in the number of pharmacists and there were justifiable concerns that we would not have enough pharmacists to meet societal needs.
Validation of the entrustable professional activities for new pharmacy graduates
AbstractPurpose The face validity of the core entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for new pharmacy graduates published by the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) in 2017 was evaluated.Methods A 28-item questionnaire was sent to experienced pharmacy practitioners affiliated with 4 schools of pharmacy.
Improving peer review: What reviewers can do
As an author, there is no better feeling than to receive correspondence from a journal editor that your paper has been accepted for publication. However, that sense of elation can quickly turn to dread if the author has to respond to dozens, even hundreds, of comments from peer reviewers.
Improving peer review: What journals can do
Peer review is a shared responsibility intended to enhance the quality of manuscripts published in biomedical journals. Under ideal circumstances, everyone-authors, reviewers, and editors-understands their role and responsibilities, approaching the process with deliberate thoughtfulness. In our
Improving peer review: What authors can do
Publishing manuscripts in the peer-reviewed literature is essential for the advancement of both science and healthcare.[1][1] For those who work in academic environments, including residency or fellowship training programs, disseminating one's work in peer-reviewed journals and other forums is
Improving peer review: What authors can do
Publishing manuscripts in the peer-reviewed literature is essential for the advancement of both science and healthcare.1 For those who work in academic environments, including residency or fellowship training programs, disseminating one’s work in peer-reviewed journals and other forums is important for career progression. Despite these benefits, the process of submitting a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal can be daunting.
Improving peer review: What reviewers can do
As an author, there is no better feeling than to receive correspondence from a journal editor that your paper has been accepted for publication. However, that sense of elation can quickly turn to dread if the author has to respond to dozens, even hundreds, of comments from peer reviewers. We have observed that the quality of peer reviews has declined over the past decade, and their focus is often misguided, emphasizing grammar and style over science and methodology.
Improving peer review: What journals can do
Peer review is a shared responsibility intended to enhance the quality of manuscripts published in biomedical journals. Under ideal circumstances, everyone—authors, reviewers, and editors—understands their role and responsibilities, approaching the process with deliberate thoughtfulness.
Impact of a national antimicrobial stewardship mentoring program: Insights and lessons learned
AbstractPurpose The impact of an interprofessional mentoring program to advance antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in selected U.S. hospitals and lessons learned are described.Summary A seven-step mentoring process with self-assessment, telephone calls, continuing education, a one-day onsite visit, action plan, and outcome data collection and analysis was provided to ASP teams at nine hospitals. Six hospitals completed the program.
Impact of a national antimicrobial stewardship mentoring program: Insights and lessons learned
AbstractPurpose The impact of an interprofessional mentoring program to advance antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in selected U.S. hospitals and lessons learned are described.Summary A seven-step mentoring process with self-assessment, telephone calls, continuing education, a one-day onsite visit, action plan, and outcome data collection and analysis was provided to ASP teams at nine hospitals. Six hospitals completed the program.
Best practices for safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals: Recommendations from an expert panel Delphi consensus process
AbstractPurpose A Delphi consensus development process was used to identify best practices for the safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals.Methods A panel of healthcare professionals with experience in patient safety activities and development of insulin-use guidelines was selected. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, panelists were asked to identify key concepts and practices relating to safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals.
Best practices for safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals: Recommendations from an expert panel Delphi consensus process
Purpose A Delphi consensus development process was used to identify best practices for the safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals. Methods A panel of healthcare professionals with experience in patient safety activities and development of insulin-use guidelines was selected. In round 1 of a 4-round Delphi process, panelists were asked to identify key concepts and practices relating to safe use of insulin pen devices in hospitals.
Facilitating the safe use of insulin pens in hospitals through a mentored quality-improvement program
Purpose Results of the MENTORED QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IMPACT PROGRAM? (MQIIP) on Ensuring Insulin Pen Safety in Hospitals, which was part of an ASHP educational initiative aimed at ensuring the safe use of insulin pens in hospitals, are described.
Best practices in ensuring the safe use of insulin pens in the hospital: Introduction
Hyperglycemia is common in hospitalized patients, and insulin is the preferred antihyperglycemic treatment in the inpatient setting.1,2 Insulin is a high-alert medication associated with a significant risk for patient harm when used incorrectly or inappropriately.3 Numerous reports have described the reuse of insulin pens on multiple patients by healthcare professionals, potentially exposing patients to blood-borne diseases.4–6 Safety concerns associated with U-500 insulin pens have also been...
Best Practice Strategies for Effective Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool
ABSTRACT Questions have long been used as a teaching tool by teachers and preceptors to assess students’ knowledge, promote comprehension, and stimulate critical thinking. Well-crafted questions lead to new insights, generate discussion, and promote the comprehensive exploration of subject matter. Poorly constructed questions can stifle learning by creating confusion, intimidating students, and limiting creative thinking.
Show More
loading
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Stuart T.
Contact Stuart T., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack