Skip To Main Content
Thomas Greeson on Muck Rack

Thomas Greeson

Virginia
As seen in: JD Supra, Lexology, Mondaq, Aunt Minnie, LexBlog, Open Legal Blog Archive
Attorney specializing in the field of diagnostic imaging. Active Dem. Married to awesome Catherine Read! Love Virginia wine! Go Dawgs! All tweets my own views.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Thomas

Contact Thomas, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Information blocking rules update: what diagnostic radiology groups should know now

|
By Thomas Greeson
| reedsmith.com
It is increasingly becoming possible that radiology groups that routinely embargo imaging results from patients with significant findings could face scrutiny under the 21st Century Cures Act information blocking rules. In September 2025, HHS Secretary Kennedy directed agency resources toward active enforcement, and in February 2026, ASTP/ONC began issuing letters of nonconformity to certified EHR developers.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Remote Patient Monitoring at Risk: Could Qualified Third-Party Entities—like Remote Monitoring IDTFs—Preserve Patient Access Under CMS’s Proposed Rule?

|
By Nancy Halstead, Thomas Greeson, Allie Klimkiewicz, Lily Barrett
| reedsmith.com
On July 16, 2026, CMS published the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule, which contains a proposal that could reshape how remote patient monitoring services are delivered to Medicare beneficiaries. Key Takeaways CMS is proposing to require that remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) and remote therapy monitoring (RTM) services be furnished only by direct employees of the billing practitioner’s practice.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

House MARCA bill leaves physician offices behind in RA reimbursement proposal

|
By Thomas Greeson
| reedsmith.com
When the Senate version of the Medicare Access to Radiology Care Act of 2026 (MARCA) was introduced earlier this year, it offered an important Medicare payment pathway for services performed by radiologist assistants (RAs). The legislation would allow payment to a supervising radiologist for qualifying RA services furnished in certain facility settings. We discussed the Senate bill in late May.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 138 articles