Skip To Main Content
Upasana Sajeev on Muck Rack

Upasana Sajeev

Verified
India
As seen in: Live Law, EIN News
Lawyer | Legal Correspondent @LiveLawIndia | Mail: upasana@livelaw.in
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Upasana

Contact Upasana, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Madras High Court Acquits Death Row Prisoner Accused Of Sexually Abusing 5 Minors, Says 'Draconian' POCSO Provisions Weaponised

|
By Upasana Sajeev Verified
| Live Law Verified
The bench of Justice Anand Venkatesh and Justice KK Ramakrishnan observed that the prosecution case suffered from material inconsistencies, omissions and deficiencies which create a reasonable doubt. The court added that when such doubt arises, the rule of law requires acquittal. “When reasonable doubt survives a conscientious judicial scrutiny, acquittal is not an act of indulgence; it is the command of the rule of law.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Environmental Clearance, Pollution Control Board Approval Not Mandatory For Essentiality Certificate Of Medical Institution: Madras High Court

|
By Upasana Sajeev Verified
| Live Law Verified
It may be noted that an Essentiality Certificate is issued by the State giving its opinion on whether a medical college is needed in a given area. The bench of Chief Justice SA Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan held that though the certificate and approval were mandatory before constructing or commissioning a medical institution, they were not part of the qualifying criteria prescribed for obtaining an Essentiality certificate.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Madras High Court Questions Confidentiality Of Look Out Circulars, Says Affected Person Should Know Why He Is Facing Adverse Proceedings

|
By Upasana Sajeev Verified
| Live Law Verified
This country does not follow a kafkaite trial, Court said. The Madras High Court recently remarked that our country does not follow a kafkaite trial and gives an accused the right to know why he is facing adverse proceedings. Justice V Lakshminarayanan said that a trial in the country operates in accordance with Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution and any person who is affected by proceedings should be made aware of it. “Prima facie,...
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (3) Issue with article?
See all 3,188 articles