Yash Khanna

Supporting Information Filename Description bju70115-sup-0001-TablesS1-S9.docxWord 2007 document , 37.5 KB Table S1. Baseline characteristics of the cohort of 117 patients. Table S2. Surgical histopathology of 117 patients investigated with mpMRI and PET-PSMA for BCR after RP. Table S3. Univariate analysis: predictors of LR on PSMA and MRI combined. Table S4. Univariate analysis: predictors of DR on PSMA and MRI combined. Table S5. Univariate analysis: predictors of LR on PSMA. Table S6.

The subject of unilateral appointment of arbitrators arising from the Supreme Court of India’s (“Court”) three-judge bench decision in Central Organization for Railway Electrification v. ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) (“CORE I”), which held that one party’s power to unilaterally appoint an arbitrator was counterbalanced by a choice provided to the counter party to choose from a panel of arbitrators, has been the subject of serious debate (see here, here, , and here).

Original Article Yash Khanna & Vidyasagar Chinni contributed equally to this work, as co-first authors. Abstract Objective To evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Gallium-68 (68Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in guiding salvage therapy for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-radical prostatectomy.