Andrew D. Pucker on Muck Rack

Andrew D. Pucker

Fond du Lac
As seen in: Color Research & Application, Nature, Wiley Online Library, Dove Medical Press, Healio, Primary Care Optometry News, Review of Optometry, Ophthalmology Times, Ophthalmology Times Europe, Contact Lens Spectrum and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Andrew D.

Contact Andrew D., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Comment on: “Current and emerging strategies for myopia control: a narrative review of optical, pharmacological, behavioural, and adjunctive therapies” | Eye

|
By Timothy J. Gawne, Andrew D. Pucker
| Nature Verified
To the Editor: We read with interest the review article by Maulvi et al. [1]. We found the review to be of high quality, but take issue with their citation of our paper [2]:“the 20-20-20 rule—looking at something 20 feet away for 20 s every 20 min—has been suggested as a simple method to reduce accommodative stress and visual fatigue.” First, both our paper and their review address myopia, not visual fatigue.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Q&A: Do we need new terminology for ‘artificial tears’?

|
By Justin Cooper Verified, Kaleb S. Abbott, Andrew D. Pucker
| Primary Care Optometry News Verified
Ask a clinical question and tap into Healio AI's knowledge base. Key takeaways: Artificial tears are not true substitutes for biological tears, so the terminology can be misleading in treatment decisions. The term “lubricating drop” could be less confusing for patients and providers.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Satisfaction of biweekly senofilcon a toric contact lens wearers who w

|
By Chris Lievens, Andrew D. Pucker, Bradley Giedd, Shane Kannarr
| Dove Medical Press
Introduction Despite advances in contact lens (CL) technology, the frequency of CL dropout remains relatively high, with about 20% of all experienced CL wearers dropping out of CLs each year; the majority drop out because of discomfort issues.1,2 The seriousness of CL discomfort is further highlighted by Begley et al, who found that most CL wearers at least occasionally notice CL discomfort.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 29 licensed articles (54 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified