Charles E. Binkley on Muck Rack

Charles E. Binkley

Metro
As seen in: Nature, JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association), The New England Journal of Medicine, Veredict, STAT, McKnight's Long-Term Care News, The American Journal of Bioethics, The Podcast by KevinMD
AI Ethicist || HPB Surgeon || Alumnus @UMichSurgery || GSD ❤️|| 🏳️‍🌈 he/him. Views are my own.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Charles E.

Contact Charles E., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Health AI poses distinct harms and potential benefits for disabled people - Nature Medicine

|
By Charles E. Binkley, Joel Reynolds
| Nature Verified
Relative to other groups for whom the risk of bias in artificial intelligence (AI) has been identified, little attention has been given to the potential harms, and distinct benefits, that AI models could bring about for disabled people.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Does Informed Consent Alone Mitigate Responsibility: Considering Patient Harm Related to Artificial Intelligence

|
By Charles E. Binkley
| Veredict Verified
The previous article in this series, Is Informed Consent Necessary When Artificial Intelligence is Used for Patient Care: Applying the Ethics from Justice Cardozo’s Opinion in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, argued that patients should be informed when AI is used in making their health care decisions. This article will explore the range of potential harms attributable to AI models and ask whether informed consent alone mitigates responsibility.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Is Informed Consent Necessary When Artificial Intelligence is Used for Patient Care: Applying the Ethics from Justice Cardozo’s Opinion in Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital

|
By Charles E. Binkley
| Veredict Verified
This is the first article in a series exploring ethical concerns about patient informed consent when Artificial Intelligence is used for clinical decision-making. A cornerstone tenet in bioethics is that patients must be respected as autonomous beings and that their preferences should determine what is acceptable and unacceptable in their health care. Justice Benjamin Cardozo’s 1914 opinion in the case of Schloendorff v.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 22 licensed articles (24 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified