Skip To Main Content
Cory Clark on Muck Rack

Cory Clark

As seen in: ResearchGate, Wiley Online Library, Memory Studies, Frontiers, PNAS, SAGE Publishing, Taylor & Francis Online, The Boston Globe, ProQuest, HotAir and
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Cory

Contact Cory, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

An adversarial collaboration on the rigidity‐of‐the‐right, symmetry thesis, or rigidity‐of‐extremes: The answer depends on the question

|
By Shauna Bowes, Cory Clark, Lucian Gideon Conway, Thomas Costello
| Wiley Online Library Verified
INTRODUCTION Adorno (1950) hypothesized that ideological beliefs are coherent manifestations of dispositions, prompting decades of scholarship examining the psychological characteristics underlying political ideology (Hibbing et al., 2014; Rokeach, 1960; Tetlock, 1983).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Morally offensive scientific findings activate cognitive chicanery

|
By Cory Clark, Nicholas Kerry, Maja Graso, Philip E. Tetlock
| Wiley Online Library Verified
INTRODUCTION What is good and what values should be upheld are fundamental questions for every collective. Historically, religious leaders and rulers took on the role of deciding such matters, seeking credibility by claiming exclusive insights into truth.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Morally Offensive Scientific Findings Activate Cognitive Chicanery

|
By Cory Clark, Nicholas Kerry, Maja Graso, Philip E. Tetlock
| ResearchGate
activate more defense strategies when evaluating findings among like-minded others vs. in Our studies have multiple limitations. One persistent challenge for research exploring motivated reasoning is that people’s evaluations cannot be effectively untangled from their prior beliefs. Many demonstrations of differential evaluations of identical methods—those that differ only in the direction of their conclusions—can be explained by differences in participants’ preexisting beliefs.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 34 licensed articles (36 Total)