Craig Slater on Muck Rack

Craig Slater

  • Communications Officer, SGI
Canada
As seen in: Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC), News.com.au, Nurse Education Today, Taylor & Francis Online, The Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, CFCF-TV (Montreal, QC), CFRE-TV (Regina, SK), CFTO-TV (Scarborough, ON), CICT-TV (Calgary, AB) and
Apathetic.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Craig

Contact Craig, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

FIA, Mercedes’e Motor Güncelleme İzni Verdi

|
By Muaz Kalaycı, David Croft, Craig Slater
| Haber Aktuel
FIA’nın 2026 sezonu öncesinde motor performans sıralamasına dayanarak verdiği geliştirme izinleri, Formula 1 dünyasında şaşkınlık ve tartışma yarattı. Monaco Grand Prix’sinin ardından ortaya çıkan karara göre, sezonun altı yarışını da kazanan Mercedes ve Ferrari’ye motor yükseltme izni verilirken, en güçlü içten yanmalı motora sahip olduğu belirlenen Red Bull bu haktan yararlanamayacak.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Cannabis Laws of Canada

|
By Donald J. Bourgeois, Craig Slater
| LexisNexis
Author (s) : Donald J. Bourgeois , Craig Slater This text reviews the regulatory regimes nationwide to provide a comprehensive understanding of cannabis law in Canada. Publication Language: English Published: August 28, 2025 Publisher: LexisNexis Canada Product Format Details Qty Book $160.00 In Stock ISBN: 9780433537397 Cannabis is not like other “drugs.” While it remains a substance that is controlled for public policy and public health purposes, it has become widely accepted.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

G 1/24 - A New Era Of Claim Interpretation At The EPO?

|
By Christopher Hall, Craig Slater
| Mondaq
Following on from the Oral Proceedings in March, the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal has now issued its extremely concise decision in the case G 1/24, concluding that the description and drawings shall "always" be consulted to interpret the claims when the EPO is assessing the patentability of an invention, and not only if the claims are found to be unclear in isolation.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 386 licensed articles (396 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Craig

Contact Craig, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified