Skip To Main Content
GianCarlo Canaparo on Muck Rack

GianCarlo Canaparo

Washington, D.C.
As seen in: MSN, Fox News, Newsweek, The Hill, National Review, Washington Times, Yahoo, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, The Daily Caller, Washington Examiner and
Legal Fellow @Heritage. Courts, Crime, Constitution. Co-host @SCOTUS101. Views mine; RTs not endorsements.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with GianCarlo

Contact GianCarlo, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Vacatur: Is it Historical? Constitutional? — Part II, by Jameson M. Payne & GianCarlo Canaparo - Yale Journal on Regulation

|
By GianCarlo Canaparo, Jameson M. Payne
| yalejreg.com
[Part I is available here.] In the first part of this post, we explored the history of section 706, and why it probably does not support universal remedies. But even so, several Justices have hinted at their hesitation to read vacatur out of the APA. This will force the Court to contend with the second hurdle that vacatur must leap before it fills the shoes of the nationwide injunction, and the one we deal with in our own article. Is vacatur constitutional?
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Congress Keeps Pushing Colleges To Discriminate—but the Fight Back Has Finally Begun

|
By GianCarlo Canaparo, Campbell Collins
| The Daily Signal Verified
This June, Tennessee joined the civil rights organization Students for Fair Admissions to file a lawsuit opposing racial discrimination in higher education. That might give you a sneaking sense of déjà vu—didn’t the Supreme Court crack down on racial preferences two years ago in Students for Fair Admission v. Harvard? While the court made it clear in the Harvard case that admitting students based on race is unconstitutional, Congress hasn’t gotten the memo.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

What Made Justice Kagan Change Her Mind on Universal Injunctions?

|
By GianCarlo Canaparo, Campbell Collins
| The Daily Signal Verified
When judges change their mind, they explain their reasons. Or at least they ought to, because that’s what makes their judgments trustworthy. But when the Supreme Court decided Trump v. CASA this term, Justice Elena Kagan suddenly changed her mind on universal injunctions—and didn’t explain why. There, the Supreme Court held that federal courts likely don’t have authority to issue universal injunctions.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 394 licensed articles (413 Total)