Skip To Main Content
Inbar Preiss on Muck Rack

Inbar Preiss

Verified
  • Senior Intellectual Property Correspondent, MLex
Brussels
As seen in: MLex, Medium, NewsBreak, International Journalists Network, The Block, The Parliament Magazine, Are We Europe
Journalist covering intellectual property @mlexclusive | Previously crypto regulation reporter @DLNewsInfo & @TheBlock__

Get in touch with Inbar

Contact Inbar, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Inbar Preiss’s Biography

Read Full Bio →

A journalist, editor and writer based in Brussels passionate about bringing human stories to politics. I focus on human rights, cryptocurrency and EU affairs.

Articles

Copyright rules may not need overhaul but better enforcement, EU official says

|
By Inbar Preiss Verified
| MLex Verified
By Inbar Preiss ( March 23, 2026, 17:23 GMT | Insight) -- EU officials say copyright rules may not need overhauling to address AI challenges, but a focus instead put on enforcement and licensing.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (430) Issue with article?

This week at the UPC: March 13-19

|
By Inbar Preiss Verified, Charlotte Westphal, Anna Lauwereys
| MLex Verified
By Inbar Preiss, Charlotte Westphal and Anna Lauwereys ( March 19, 2026, 15:56 GMT | Insight) -- This week, the Unified Patent Court saw key rulings on infringement, fair licensing defenses in standard essential patent disputes, and jurisdiction clarifications. Judges also issued rulings on procedural rules on confidentiality, evidence and security for costs.The UPC has seen a flurry of enforcement decisions in the past week.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (115) Issue with article?

UPC blocks cross-border patent claims while broader questions remain pending

|
By Inbar Preiss Verified
| MLex Verified
By Inbar Preiss ( March 17, 2026, 15:18 GMT | Comment) -- The Unified Patent Court ruled that it cannot hear infringement claims relating to non-UPC patent rights when jurisdiction is based on the “place of harm” rule, appeal judges ruled in favor of OpenAI, Adobe and others on Friday.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (293) Issue with article?
See all 753 articles