Skip To Main Content
Jeremy Fox on Muck Rack

Jeremy Fox

Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom
As seen in: Medium, Nature, Wiley Online Library, PLOS Biology, Boston.com, Substack, The Boston Globe, Bon Appetit, openDemocracy, The Business Times (Singapore) and
Writer, journalist, classical guitarist, UK/Cda/Latinoamérica, Books: Chocolate Man(1995), Cauldron (2009) Conquest (2021), En Busca del Padre A. Roig (2023)
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Jeremy

Contact Jeremy, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Poll results: acknowledgements in scientific papers are the least controversial topic in the world

|
By Jeremy Fox
| wordpress.com
Pretty much no decent-sized sample of people will all agree, on anything. Even experts don’t all agree on the topics on which they’re experts. 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming–which means that 3% disagree. 95% of members of the American Economics Association agree that tariffs usually reduce economic welfare–which means that 5% disagree.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Even microcosm experiments can be difficult to replicate

|
By Jeremy Fox
| wordpress.com
There’s a lot of discussion right now in ecology about replicability/reproducibility (call it what you will). See for instance this recent (and awesome!) interview with Kate Laskowski. One question is whether, or to what extent, we should expect ecological field studies to replicate, since the results of many ecological field studies are sensitive to all sorts of uncontrollable ecological factors (the weather, the genotypes of the organisms involved, etc. etc.).
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

A striking retraction from Ecology Letters

|
By Jeremy Fox
| wordpress.com
Tao et al. 2024, on microbially-mediated interactions between native and non-native plants, has just been retracted by Ecology Letters. And…wow. I’ve never seen a retraction notice like this in ecology. According to the notice, an EcoLetts editor identified “unusual repetitive patterns” in the underlying data, “identified using common statistical analysis tools,” that were unlikely to have occurred by chance in “a typical data collection effort”.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 90 licensed articles (383 Total)