Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile
Get in touch with Lauren
Contact Lauren, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck RackActions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Articles
The legacy of language: What we say, and what people hear, when we talk about genomics
Summary The way we “talk” about genetics plays a vital role in whether public audiences feel at ease in having conversations about it. Our research explored whether there was any difference between “what we say” and “what people hear” when providing information about genetics to community groups who are known to be missing from genomics datasets.
Should doctors have a legal duty to warn relatives of their genetic risks?
On Nov 18–25, 2019, a legal case (QB-2013-009529, ABC vs St George's Healthcare NHS Trust) was heard in the Royal Courts of Justice in London, UK. The case concerns a man who killed his wife in 2007. He was convicted of manslaughter and while in a forensic psychiatric unit, in 2009, was diagnosed with Huntington's disease, a progressive neurological condition that confers a 50/50 inherited risk to first-degree relatives.
Actions
Is this you?
As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.Get in touch with Lauren
Contact Lauren, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.
Learn more about Muck Rack