Mark A. Rubin on Muck Rack

Mark A. Rubin

Bern
As seen in: Nature, Wiley Online Library, Critical Metascience, SAGE Publishing, Taylor & Francis Online, Diagnostic Pathology, JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association), Oncology Times, Daily Business Review, Cell Press and
Precision Medicine & Prostate Cancer Researcher. Off-target resistance keeps me driven to find a cure! @Unibern 🏈Michigan 🚴⛰️ Be part of the solution
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Mark A.

Contact Mark A., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Feminist Metascience, Risk-Averse Peer Review, & Systems Change Theory

|
By Mark A. Rubin
| Critical Metascience
Feminist Metascience Madeleine Pownall writes about Carolyn Wood Sherif, a pioneer of feminist psychology. Carolyn Wood Sherif.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Critical Metascience Roundup

|
By Mark A. Rubin
| Critical Metascience
Average replicability rates Theories don’t die! Is the replication crisis overblown? Postdoctoral Fellowships Partial replications Berna Devezer and Erkan Buzbas published a preprint disputing the idea that a high average replication rate indicates a healthy literature and a low rate indicates a crisis. They argue that: Aggregating replicability rates across heterogeneous literatures produces averages that conflate incommensurable experimental regimes and lack a stable scientific interpretation.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Critical Metascience Roundup

|
By Mark A. Rubin
| Critical Metascience
20:20 hindsight on scientific progress Open research in the humanities The role of scientific sleuths Individual bias and collective criticism Whitney Barlow Robles looks back over the history of scientific progress and notes that a lot of it would look “unscientific” by today’s standards . . . which will look “unscientific” in the future! People sometimes look back at past scientists and ask: “Could they really have been this dumb?
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 67 licensed articles (72 Total)

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Get in touch with Mark A.

Contact Mark A., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified