Skip To Main Content
Nipun J. Patel on Muck Rack

Nipun J. Patel

As seen in: Law.com, JD Supra, The National Law Review, Mondaq
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Nipun J.

Contact Nipun J., search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Court Dismisses ERISA Fee Suit Against Kellogg, Reinforcing Pleading Standards For Plan Sponsors

|
By Nipun J. Patel, Cory Thomas, Jessica Linse
| Mondaq
Polsinelli LLP are most popular: within International Law, Intellectual Property, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s) with readers working within the Healthcare industries Michigan federal court dismisses ERISA fee claims against Kellogg with prejudice. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege fiduciary breaches tied to 401(k) recordkeeping fees, ending the multi-year litigation effort. Generalized fee comparisons remain insufficient to plead imprudence.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

Court Dismisses ERISA Fee Suit Against Kellogg, Reinforcing Pleading Standards for Plan Sponsors | JD Supra

|
By Jessica Linse, Nipun J. Patel, Cory Thomas
| JD Supra
Key Takeaways Michigan federal court dismisses ERISA fee claims against Kellogg with prejudice. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege fiduciary breaches tied to 401(k) recordkeeping fees, ending the multi-year litigation effort. Generalized fee comparisons remain insufficient to plead imprudence. The decision reinforces that ERISA plaintiffs must allege specific, like‑for‑like comparisons to survive a motion to dismiss. Documented oversight remains key to early dismissal.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Michigan Federal Court Dismisses Kellogg ERISA Fee Claims

|
By Nipun J. Patel
| The National Law Review Verified
Michigan federal court dismisses ERISA fee claims against Kellogg with prejudice. The court held that the plaintiff failed to plausibly allege fiduciary breaches tied to 401(k) recordkeeping fees, ending the multi-year litigation effort. Generalized fee comparisons remain insufficient to plead imprudence. The decision reinforces that ERISA plaintiffs must allege specific, like‑for‑like comparisons to survive a motion to dismiss. Documented oversight remains key to early dismissal.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 8 articles