Patrick Curran on Muck Rack

Patrick Curran

Ohio
As seen in: MSN, Yahoo Entertainment, Nature, ACS Publications, Flipboard, Car and Driver, AllAfrica, Times Union (Albany), Washingtonian, JD Supra and
Senior Digital Media manager at WTWH Media.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Patrick

Contact Patrick, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Massachusetts PFMLA and the Scope of Employer-Only Liability

|
By Patrick Curran, Ariana N. Imbrescia
| ogletree.com
Quick Hits The Massachusetts Superior Court held that the PFMLA’s anti-retaliation protections impose obligations only on “employers” as defined in the unemployment insurance statute, and do not extend liability to a corporate employer’s officers, agents, investors, or board members. The court distinguished the PFMLA from the Massachusetts Wage Act, which expressly deems corporate officers and agents to be “employers” of the corporation’s employees, language that is absent from the PFMLA.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (3) Issue with article?

The Royal Holiday Hosting Guide: What to Know About Meghan Markle's Netflix Holiday Special

|
By Patrick Curran
| The Mothers with Sara Brown
If you thought the holiday season couldn’t get any more festive, just wait until Meghan Markle invites you over. Her upcoming Netflix special, With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration, is set to premiere this December and promises to deliver a full dose of warmth, tradition, and that signature Montecito sparkle. According to Netflix, this special edition will see Meghan hosting a “magical holiday celebration” at her home base in Montecito, California.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

SJC Holds That Retention Bonuses Do Not Constitute 'Wages' Under The Massachusetts Wage Act

|
By Laurielle Howe, Patrick Curran
| Mondaq
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart are most popular: within Consumer Protection topic(s) Quick Hits On October 22, 2025, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court concluded that a retention bonus is not a “wage” for purposes of the Massachusetts Wage Act, and that such bonuses are instead a form of additional, contingent compensation outside the ambit of the Wage Act.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 257 licensed articles (261 Total)
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified