Skip To Main Content
Peter Mahler on Muck Rack

Peter Mahler

New York
As seen in: Law.com, New York Law Journal, BiggerPockets, JD Supra, Mondaq, Property & Casualty 360 Perspectives Podcast, PropertyCasualty360, LexBlog, Open Legal Blog Archive
New York City lawyer, blogger, podcaster specializing in business divorce litigation among co-owners of LLCs, partnerships and close corporations.
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Peter

Contact Peter, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Summer Shorts: Judicial Dissolution Meets the Dead Man's Statute, and Other Recent Decisions of Interest | JD Supra

|
By Peter Mahler
| JD Supra
Welcome to this 16th annual edition of Summer Shorts.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (2) Issue with article?

Summer Shorts: Judicial Dissolution Meets The Dead Man’s Statute, And Other Recent Decisions Of Interest

|
By Peter Mahler
| Mondaq
Peter Mahler’s articles from Farrell Fritz, P.C. are most popular: within Corporate/Commercial Law topic(s) in United States with readers working within the Banking & Credit, Insurance and Law Firm industries Farrell Fritz, P.C. are most popular: with Finance and Tax Executives Welcome to this 16th annual edition of Summer Shorts.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Wait a Minute! Just Because I Failed to Meet a Lousy Capital Call, You Took My Membership Interest That You Valued at $1.7 Million and Paid Me Nothing?

|
By Peter Mahler
| JD Supra
Here we go again. My last outing on this blog analyzed a dispute over the consequences of a limited partner’s failure to meet a mandatory capital call. There, the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, held that under the Delaware limited partnership agreement’s terms featuring dueling “notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary” clauses, the limited partner lost its right to vote on defined Major Decisions.
Open in Who Shared View Duplicates (3) Issue with article?
See all 400 articles