Robert Grattan on Muck Rack

Robert Grattan

Austin
As seen in: Austin Business Journal, Chron, Puget Sound Business Journal, Sacramento Business Journal, Houston Chronicle, MYSA, JD Supra, The National Law Review, The Beaumont Enterprise, Lexology and
I cover courts and city government for the Austin Business Journal (@myABJ). You can also follow me at @rpgrattan
Is this you? As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work. Claim your profile

Get in touch with Robert

Contact Robert, search articles and posts on X, monitor coverage, and track replies from one place.

Learn more about Muck Rack

Actions

Share this page

Is this you?

As a journalist, you can create a free Muck Rack account to customize your profile, list your contact preferences, and upload a portfolio of your best work.
Claim your profile

Articles

Use It or Lose It: U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC That 363(m) Protections Can Be Waived | JD Supra

|
By Mark Dendinger, Robert Grattan, Jonathan Lozano
| JD Supra
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its latest bankruptcy opinion in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC, holding that the Bankruptcy Code’s rule against invalidating 363 sales after appeal is not an iron-clad jurisdictional bar, but rather a mere statutory limitation.[1] The holding resolves a circuit split in favor of a weaker interpretation of section 363(m), a section that offers finality to buyers in the fast-paced world of bankruptcy sales.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Use It or Lose It: U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC That 363(m) Protections Can Be Waived

|
By Robert Grattan
| The National Law Review Verified
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its latest bankruptcy opinion in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC, holding that the Bankruptcy Code’s rule against invalidating 363 sales after appeal is not an iron-clad jurisdictional bar, but rather a mere statutory limitation.[1] The holding resolves a circuit split in favor of a weaker interpretation of section 363(m), a section that offers finality to buyers in the fast-paced world of bankruptcy sales.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?

Use It or Lose It: U.S. Supreme Court Unanimously Holds in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC That 363(m) Protections Can Be Waived

|
By Robert Grattan, Mark Dendinger, Jonathan Lozano
| Lexology Verified
The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued its latest bankruptcy opinion in MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC, holding that the Bankruptcy Code’s rule against invalidating 363 sales after appeal is not an iron-clad jurisdictional bar, but rather a mere statutory limitation.[1] The holding resolves a circuit split in favor of a weaker interpretation of section 363(m), a section that offers finality to buyers in the fast-paced world of bankruptcy sales.
Open in Who Shared Issue with article?
See all 685 articles
 •  Privacy  •  Terms  •  Security and Legal  •   •   •   • 

© 2026 Muck Rack

SOC 2® Certified